World Journal of Surgical Oncology
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchA case-control study to evaluate urinary tract complications in radical hysterectomyNadereh Behtash1 , Fatemeh Ghaemmaghami1 , Haleh Ayatollahi1 , Hediyeh Khaledi2,3 and Parviz Hanjani4  1
Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2
Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 4
Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Rosenfeld Cancer Center, Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA, USA author email corresponding author email
World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2005,
3:12doi:10.1186/1477-7819-3-12
|
| Published: |
16 February 2005 |
Abstract
Background
This study has evaluated urinary tract injuries and dysfunction after Radical Hysterectomy (RH) performed in patients with cervical cancer and has compared the cystometric parameters and urinary complications occurring in these patients with those occurring in patients who had undergone Simple Hysterectomy (SH).
Patients and methods
A prospective case-control study was conducted to evaluate urinary tract injuries (intra-operative and post-operative) and dysfunction in 50 patients undergoing RH for cervical cancer and to compare them with the same parameters in 50 patients who underwent SH for benign disease.
Results
Mean age in the RH group was 46.3 years and in the SH group was 50.1 (p = 0.63). There were no bladder and urethral injuries in either group of patients. There was one intra-operative ureteral injury in the RH patients but none in those who underwent SH. (p < 0.05). In the two weeks after surgery, 15% of RH patients and 11% of SH patients had experienced a urinary tract infection urinary tract infection (p = 0.61). Two week after surgery 62% of RH patients had no urinary symptoms, compared to 84% in the SH group who did (p < 0.02). Urinary residual volume, first urinary sensation and maximal bladder capacity were higher in the RH group, but this was not statistically significant. The only case of a urinary fistula appeared in a patient who received 5000 cGy radiation therapy pre-operatively, but this spontaneously healed after 3 weeks of catheterization.
Conclusions
Intra-operative and post-operative urinary tract complications are comparable in patients undergoing RH and SH and an expert gynaecological oncologist might be able to further decrease complications. However, radiation therapy before surgery may increase the risk of complications. |